Wednesday, August 14, 2013

5301 - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly


Lectures
One of the genuine pleasures of taking EDLD 5301 is knowing that the course designers, professor, and my field supervisor all seem truly concerned with my success in the course.  The weekly lectures delivered in interview format between Dr. Arterbury and Dr. Jenkins provided a succinct and clear explanation of the new learning each week.  Their scripted discussions eliminated any danger to ramble unnecessarily.  I especially enjoyed week five as they challenged us to remain focused on growth as we step into the mantle of leadership.   The web conferences with Dr. Abshire were equally assuring as she walked us through each step of putting together our action research project.  She graciously answer every question, often numerous times, yet challenged us to seek out the answers in course documents already provided.  Her weekly discussions always put my apprehensions in check.  The web conference with Mr. Bain, my field supervisor, was also a calming experience.  He was encouraging and supportive of our wonderings and made connections with his current or past experiences.  Overall, the connections created between Lamar and student through the lectures and web conferences make this online experience personal and manageable.

Readings
Both texts assigned for this course have proven to be extremely practical.  The Dana text (2009) lays the philosophical foundation of action research and is filled with easily relatable examples and clear explanations.  The Harris text (2010) provides a step-by-step guide for walking through the action research process.  Both work well together to create a thorough and manageable introduction to action research.  If I had to select only one resource for this course, I would select the Dana text, as it provided a wealth of information on both the philosophical and practice levels. 

Searches, like electronic searches of topics and questions
I spent a great deal of time searching for possible ways to attack our low EOC Writing scores.  I found many strategies that are currently making an impact in classrooms around the country.  Project based learning, flipped learning, blogs and wikis, and community writing activities have all been successful, but I didn’t feel that my knowledge base and our technology infrastructure would enable me to move forward in any of these areas in such a short time span.  Then I stumbled upon Joseph M. Shosh’s work (2004) in which he transformed his students’ critical thinking skills and writing skills through the use of a dialogic discourse diary.  This led me to further examine his published work available online.  After sharing this article with a couple of my teachers, I was encouraged at their desire to develop a similar plan on our campus.

Assignments and activities
By far, the best assignment of this course fell in week 3 – writing the action research project plan.  Of course, it was also the most stressful week as well, but I found that once I centered upon a strategy, I was also to create a manageable and focused plan to encompass the entire school year.  Knowing that I am the “big picture” type of person, it was helpful to identify the specific steps along the way so that I didn’t get lost in the “idea” but would actually carry out the plan in a sequential and thoughtful way.  Even the assignments in weeks 4 and 5 to revise and evaluate the plan have brought even more clarity to the overall project.  It has been an extremely beneficial process to tackle. 

Discussion Board
The discussion boards were my least favorite part of this course.  Because the primary focus of the course was to create the action research project, I felt that much of what I was writing was repetitive from week to week.  Furthermore, since the discussion board is the precursor to the blog, I felt that much of what I was writing was repetitive from blog to discussion.  I generally enjoy learning from my cohorts’ observations through their posts, but the questions failed to generate much excitement or uniqueness.  I would love to see these questions be transformed in a way that creates that spark of discussion.

Blogs
I enjoyed making a blog and posting my comments on it, but I was discouraged by the haphazard way of garnishing feedback from my cohorts.  Unless someone forms a team or posts in Facebook, the chances of getting feedback is rare due to the large numbers of students taking this course at any given time.  Ultimately, though, I feel the process of creating and maintaining a blog is good practice for future leadership opportunities.  I went so far as to create a private blog to journal my experiences as I travel through the program at Lamar.  Hopefully, this will create a habit that I can’t do without.

Dana, N.F. (2009).  Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action
        researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, a Joint Publication with the American
        Association of School Administrators.
Harris, S., Edmonson, S., & Combs, J.P. (2010). Examining what we do to improve our
        schools: 8 steps from analysis to action. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Shosh, J.M. (2004).  Making meaning in a dialogic discourse diary.  English Journal,       
        94(1), 53-58.

Saturday, August 10, 2013

Revisions

So, my topic remains the same:  How can the use of dialogic discourse diaries help develop thoughtful writers and increase English I and English II EOC writing scores?

...but the following changes have been made to the plan:
  1. Teachers will survey students in August 2013 and May 2014 to identify attitudes toward academic writing.  
  2. All 9th and 10th grade students will participate in the study rather than the original 250 students.
  3. The PLC will analyze unit test data and formal essays at each meeting.
  4. Students will evaluate their own writing at least six times during the year.
  5. Students will write three diary entries per week using one of the following modes:  literary, expository, persuasive, analytical, or creative. 
Overall, I am pleased with the plan and look forward to meeting with the PLC next week.

Good luck to each of you as you dive in to your ARP!



Thursday, August 1, 2013

Action Research Plan


Action Planning Template
Goal:  How can the use of dialogic discourse diaries help develop thoughtful writers and increase English I and English II EOC writing scores?
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
Create PLC and narrow focus
Shari Hedstrom
July 29-31,
2013
Dana text
Harris et al. text
NCTE articles
The practicality of immediate implementation and the prospect of student achievement
PLC #1:
Determine focus
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Aug 1-2,
2013
NCTE articles
The practicality of immediate implementation and the prospect of student achievement
PLC #2:
Create framework for DDD
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Aug 1-14,
2013
PLC Binder
(norms, calendar, Shosh article, EOC data, BISD curriculum)
Align to TEKS and EOC writing objectives
PLC #3:
Randomly select 10 students (5&5) to track
and
determine 1st six weeks prompts
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Aug 15-23,
2013
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
Class Rosters
Include all modes of discourse;
track students objectively
Introduce dialogic discourse diary to 5 English I classes and 5 English II classes
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Aug 26-30, 2013
DDD Guidelines
Immediate implementation;
student comprehension
1st Six Weeks:  Complete 12 entries (11 prompts and 1 self-evaluation);
provide feedback
Katie Buckley
Eng I students

Annette Kirk
Eng II students
Aug 26-Oct 4,
2013
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
12 entries;
teacher feedback
PLC #4:
Troubleshoot student comprehension and motivation to adapt instruction
and
determine 2nd six weeks prompts
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Sept 23-27,
2013
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
Student Samples
Modify DDD guidelines;
include all modes of discourse
2nd Six Weeks:  Complete 10 entries (9 prompts and 1 self-evaluation);
provide feedback
Katie Buckley
Eng I students

Annette Kirk
Eng II students
Oct 7-Nov 8,
2013
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
10 entries;
teacher feedback
PLC #5:
Discuss HML writing traits to adapt instruction
and
determine 3rd six weeks prompts
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Oct 21-25,
2013
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
HML Samples
(2 each)
Modify DDD guidelines;
include all modes of discourse
3rd Six Weeks:  Complete 9 entries (8 prompts and 1 self-evaluation);
provide feedback
Katie Buckley
Eng I students

Annette Kirk
Eng II students
Nov 11-Dec 13,
2013
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
9 entries;
teacher feedback
PLC #6:
Analyze growth of 10 students to modify instruction
and
determine 4th six weeks prompts
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Dec 2-6,
2013
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
Samples from
10 Students
Modify DDD guidelines;
include all modes of discourse
4th Six Weeks:  Complete 12 entries (11 prompts and 1 self-evaluation);
provide feedback
Katie Buckley
Eng I students

Annette Kirk
Eng II students
Jan 9-Feb 21,
2014
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
12 entries;
teacher feedback
PLC #7:
Compare DDD entry with one major writing assignment
and
determine 5th six weeks prompts
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Feb 3-7,
2014
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
Student Samples
Modify DDD guidelines;
include all modes of discourse
5th Six Weeks:  Complete 14 entries (13 prompts and 1 self-evaluation); provide feedback
Katie Buckley
Eng I students

Annette Kirk
Eng II students
Feb 24-Apr 17,
2014
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
14 entries;
teacher feedback
PLC #8:
Analyze growth of 10 students to modify instruction
and
determine 6th six weeks prompts
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
Mar 24-28,
2014
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
Samples from
10 Students
Modify DDD guidelines;
include all modes of discourse
EOC
Writing Test
Megan Jones
BHS Teachers
Apr
2014
English I and II EOC Test
Administer test
6th Six Weeks:  Complete 12 entries (11 prompts and 1 self-evaluation);
provide feedback
Katie Buckley
Eng I students

Annette Kirk
Eng II students
Apr 21-May 30,
2014
DDD Guidelines
BISD Curriculum
12 entries;
teacher feedback
PLC #9:
Discuss growth of students and modifications for next year.
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
May
2014
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
Modify DDD guidelines;
PLC #10:
Analyze EOC data
Shari Hedstrom
Brandi Morley
Katie Buckley
Annette Kirk
June-July
2014
PLC Binder
DDD Guidelines
EOC Reports
Modify DDD guidelines;